This seems like a great plan for Wal-Mart and for most of us, but it deters equitable and fair competition for other firms that suffer because of Wal-Mart’s huge economies of scope and its ability to have the lowest prices and maybe soon, the lowest loan rates. Banks and retailers who are in the market will lose a lot of customers and the barriers to entry into any of the two industries will be raised enormously if Wal-Mart reaches its objective.
The only force that can stop Wal-Mart right now is government regulation (specifically the FTC). The government may prohibit Wal-Mart from owning or operating a bank because this behavior may be perceived as anti-competitive. However, Wal-Mart is still exerting a lot of pressure in order to open up a bank. If and when they do, the government will make sure there are enough restrictions imposed upon Wal-Mart and its bank in order to foster healthy competition throughout the economy.
Always low prices and rates? We think not.
Sources: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_06/b3919046_mz011.htm
http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm?id=2328
Authors: Adam Koussari-Amin, Amy Peckinpaugh, Braden Rotberg and Fabio Vanegas.
1 comment:
Wal-mart is pretty powerful already and with an addition of a bank Wal-Mart could take over the market. Wal-Mart could expand, halting entry into the market and become a monopoly in the market challenging the Sherman Act. Stopping Wal-Mart from expanding would be wrong, they have the right to. However, to diminish the monopoly the government must regulate by restricting Wal-Mart in their venture. The bank could produce good results for the economy as long as competition can enter into the market.
Post a Comment